What Is Happening To The Democratic Party?

The Democratic Party has become the party of hate.  I sit and wonder why this is happening.  I understand they hate President Trump which I somewhat understand. During the President George W. Bush’s presidency, I had friends that had such a hate for President Bush, it was very disturbing.  I’ve never seen such hate in anyone before.  Like I said “had” a few friends.  I no longer consider them as friends.  These are people that I had known for over 15 years in one case and 10 in another.  We never had any disagreements or confrontations what’s so ever.  I didn’t hide my conservatism from them, but I didn’t have “water cooler” discussions about politics, religion or most other personal positions I have.  I made it a point back then, but I’ve taken the stance today to absolutely avoid any conversations on politics, religion or my conservative values and beliefs.  These folks became such rabid haters that I became quite fearful of a physical confrontation would result.

Their hatred of President Bush grew to an obvious hatred of me.  Not for anything I did or said but because I was a Bush supporter and conservative.  I never gave them any reason to hate me but it was solely based on my conservative values.

The hatred I saw back in the Bush days was limited to those few people I worked with.  Today I see a widespread rabid hatred for anything conservative, Trump or anyone that supports Trump.

We saw a group of Catholic young men in Washington DC wearing MAGA caps harassed by a group of activists for no reason other than wearing the MAGA baseball cap.  The young men congregated on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial as they were instructed by their chaperones to wait for their bus.  They weren’t waving flags, signs, or protesting.  The activists screamed vile words, called them disgusting things.  The young men stood and did not respond.  Eventually a Native American activist approached the boys chanting and beating his drum.  He was surrounded by his group of activists, who were verbally harassing the young men.  Within minutes the media, Hollywood, and liberal politicians immediately went on twitter and condemned the boys for “harassing” the Native American.  As further investigation and additional video was released it became clear the young men were the recipient of the vile harassment and verbal abuse and did not confront the Native American at all.  They were quite respective and did not respond to the constant verbal abuse from the activists.1

Every day we see or hear about an incident in which a member of the LGBTQ community has been denied service because of their sexual orientation.  A cake artist in Denver, Colorado is a perfect example.  in July 2102 Jack Philips, the cake artist, was visited in his store by a gay couple.  The gay couple requested a custom wedding cake.  Jack and the gay couple had a brief discussion where Phillips informed the couple that he couldn’t provide the custom gay wedding cake celebrating their wedding due to his Christian beliefs.  He offered to sell them anything else in the store or bake another cake.  in the days after the gay couple left Phillips started getting phone calls from people threatening and harassing him because of his decision to not provide the custom cake to the gay couple.  Being a Denver native, I know for a fact there are many very good bakers and cake artists in the Denver Metro area that would have been very happy to create the gay couples wedding celebration cake.1

The gay couple took the matter to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission for sexual orientation discrimination.  The Civil Rights Commission ordered Phillips to either violate Phillips faith and create the cake or to stop designing all wedding cakes.  In addition to the two choices the Commission orders, Phillips was also ordered by the Commission to “reeducate” “his staff by teaching them that he was wrong to operate his business consistently with his faith”.  Since designing wedding cakes was approximately 40% of Phillips business the two choices were not an option.

Phillips took his case to the courts and in July 2016 Phillips attorneys, ADF attorneys, petitioned the US Supreme court to take up Phillips case.  On June 4, 2018 the US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Jack Phillips.  The ruling reversed Colorado’s decision to punish Phillips, his wife and his staff.  Regardless of the ruling from the US Supreme, the State of Colorado is harassing Jack Phillips again2.

The entire case against Jack Phillips and his wife and staff was initiated and perpetuated by pure hate; hate coming from the LGBTQ community of Denver and hate from the state of Colorado and the newly elected Governor of Colorado.

Today, the left is using hate to move people to their side, or to block the conservative side from existing.  As a conservative I see hate emerging from a wide population of our citizens; from Hollywood, radical left-wing politicians,  the media, the LGBTQ community, and the entire Democratic Party.

I often ask myself: Why? Why is there so much hate in this country now?  I have not found the answer.

 

1https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/13/us/covington-catholic-high-school-report/index.html

2http://www.adflegal.org/detailspages/client-stories-details/jack-phillips

3http://www.adflegal.org/enough-is-enough?sourcecode=10001334&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=830-31433&utm_content=Jack_Enough&mwm_id=79714662409514

 

HOW LOW CAN THE DEMOCRATS GO?

Last night, President Trump delivered his 2019 SOTU speech. President Trump delivered an excellent speech.

Speaker Pelosi completely ignored the President, didn’t display the respect she should have for the President. She consciously and deliberately shuffled through papers putting her disgust and hatred of the President on national TV. Her hatred of the President reflects her hatred of this country.

The Democrats on the other side showed their petulance, their anti-American standing, and their absolute refusal to work for America and American citizens.

The only time the Democrats rose and applauded was when President Trump acknowledged the number of women elected to the Congress last November. They only cheered themselves.

They sat and glared at the President when he spoke about the disgusting practice of late term abortion and the vile acts of New York and Virginia. New York passed a bill for late term abortion, up to and including the 9th month, and if the woman is in labor. Virginia attempted the same but it was not passed.

The Democrats didn’t even acknowledge the Presidents pledge that the United States would never be a Socialist country. They actually refused to accept that fact.

Washington Post Analysis Misleads The Reader

September 11, 2018, the Washington Post published an article by Aaron Blake attempting to downplay the significance of the latest Strozk/Page text messages released.

The text messages, albeit not complete, but  when read in context with the rest of the text messages, emails and Congressional testimony (Ohr, Lisa Page, Strzok) surrounding the conspiracy to overthrow the current Administration are extremely significant.

The latest messages continue the theme of Strzok and Lisa Pages previous text messages discussing the plan or “insurance policy” to disrupt at the least, but to destroy as the goal the Trump administration.

Blake attempted to discourage the reader from placing any credit to the overall conspiracy.  Blake took statements and sentence fragments from the text messages and portrayed them as unclear, ambiguous and emphasized Strzok attorney’s statement that the messages clearly demonstrated that Strzok and Lisa Page were actively working to track and stop any leaks to the media.

It was a commendable attempt, but it fails.  If Blake’s readers are following the DOJ/FBI corruption/conspiricy news they would find the messages are clear and damning and point directly to the the highest levels of the FBI and DOJ that also participated in the conspiricy.

 

 

 

Trummp’s latest, highly premature Peter Strzok conspiracy theory

We The People No Longer Have Control Of Our Government

With the Speaker of The House, Speaker Paul Ryan, not allowing a vote on the resolution to impeach Rod Rosenstein is a example that the citizens of this country do not have any input to how Congress responds to the voters demands.

Rep. Jim Jordan and others drafted a resolution with articles of impeachment of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.  DOJ, Rosenstein, refuse to comply with requests and subpoenas for DOJ and FBI for documents “covering the Russia probe — including the FBI’s use of informants to make contact with the 2016 Trump campaign and speculation it had abused Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act powers to gather information on Trump associates — and its examination of Hillary Clinton’s private email server.”

A brief background on why Rep Jordon is taking this action:  Rep. Jordan’s (and others) actions is an attempt to exercise their Constitutional obligation to provide oversight of the agencies of the US government that they, Congress, have established.  In particular Congress is attempting to resolve the questions of the actions taken by the FBI and the DOJ in the investigations of the 2016 Trump campaign, the use of a “dossier” prepared by the opposing campaign, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, as evidence of “collusion” that the Trump campaign and Trump himself, had with the Russian government, and the investigation and subsequent dismissal of any wrong doing by Hillary Clinton in her action of using a private, civilian email server for all her Secretary of State email communications.

Just the fact that Clinton sent and received classified information through using non-State Department, non-government, unsecured email server and the DOJ and FBI dismissed this act as carelessness but not a violation of government and State Department regulation regarding the handling classified information is enough for the Congress to suspect preferential treatment was provided by the DOJ and FBI to Hillary Clinton and her campaign and State Department staff.

As we have learned in recent weeks, a unauthorized entity had infiltrated the Hillary Clinton private email server and altered the server in such a way that the server would automatically forward all incoming and outgoing emails to an unauthorized email address.  This means that a unauthorized entity has had knowledge of all Clinton’s email communications during her tenure as Secretary of State.  This includes email communications between herself and, the the time, the President of the United States, President Obama, DOD, intelligence agencies, and individuals in other sensitive areas of the government.

Since the DOJ/FBI has decided not to take action against Hillary Clinton, her State Department Staff or her Campaign staff for violating many government regulations and US laws that require protection of classified information in their possession, Congress has every right to investigate and delve into the process and documentation surrounding the FBI’s investigation.

Since Speaker Ryan has refused to allow the Rep. Jordan’s he is refusing to let the American people know why an individual who violated US laws was not held accountable.

Jim Jordan: ‘We will actually call the vote for the impeachment of Rod Rosenstein’

FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Off the Hook | National Review

Clinton Email Investigations: Trump Justice Department Revives Them | National Review

Statement bye FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal Email Server

Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent to “Foreign Entity”

Clinton Broke Federal Rules With Email Server, Audit Finds

Congressional Investigators Find Irregularities in FBI’s Handling of Clinton Email Case

FBI Found Extensive Evidence Hillary Emails Violated Federal Records Laws

Media Is Worthy Of Their “Fake News” Reputation

On August 4’ 2018 President Trump tweeted,  Fake News reporting, a complete fabrication, that I am concerned about the meeting my wonderful son, Donald, had in Trump Tower. This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics – and it went nowhere. I did not know about it!.   After the tweet the MSM went nuts with the most outrageous claims. (See the links below for some of the hysteria).

Pundits are claiming that the tweet confirms President Trump lied about the meeting in Trump Tower; that President Trump lied about the subject of the meeting.  The MSM is also claiming this “new” information will certainly bring down the president.

The problem is, all this information was already reported by the MSM.  Nothing is new here.

The media is playing this up in an attempt to distract the country, to draw the country’s attention away from the fact that the Mueller investigation has found nothing concerning President Trump colluded, what ever that means, with the Russians in order to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Below is a link to a CNN article with a timeline published August 4, 2017, that’s right, 2017.

Timeline of Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting revelations

Below is just a sample of the faux breaking revelations:

President Admits Trump Tower Meeting Was Meant to Get Dirt on Clinton

Trump Tweet Appears To Alter Story

What Happens After The AR15 Is Banned?

The Democrats and liberals are frantically trying to use the latest mass school shooting in Florida to move their anti-gun agenda forward.  This time they have recruited into their march the survivors of the murders, their parents and the usual Hollywood types to their cause.

The anti-gun advocates are smart, very smart.  They know how to foment the public to rise up to the left’s agenda.  The anti-gun left has created the illusion the AR15 is the real cause of the shooting in Florida and others.  This illusion is being enforced again after the Florida tragedy.  The general, un-informed, public has been inundated with the false narrative that it’s the “guns’s fault” these tragedies are occurring and if the AR15 is banned and removed from society, all will be well in the world.

This morning I saw a news report of Mike Coffman, Republican representative from Denver, at a town hall.  He was booed and jeered when he offered, among other things, “reasonable restrictions within the parameters of the Second Amendment,” and again when he “suggested that the government beef up school security”.  This demonstrates the success the anti-gun, anti-second amendment, has been in turning the public away from the root of the problem and and focused them on the gun.

When the public booed and jeers when the suggestion of increased school security, it’s a clear sign that the anti-gun left is succeeding in their goal of disarming this country.

If the left is successful in banning the AR15 and the next school shooting occurs using another firearm, there will be a frantic push to ban that weapon too.  Eventually, the left will achieve their ultimate goal of a unarmed citizenship.  And all along sacrificing the unprotected children in schools.

It also shows the anti-Constitution left is succeeding in convincing the public that the Constitution is not to be revered and laws and rules can be implemented in direct opposition of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  The left refuses to acknowledge the natural rights bestowed on us by our creator.  They believe who ever is in charge can define the rights of the population.

Mueller’s Investigation Has Been Sabotaged

Robert Mueller’s investigation has become irrelevant and a waste of time and money.  And Mueller has no one but himself to blame.

It’s impossible to know what was Mueller’s original intent was when he was appointed as a Special Prosecutor and he formed his investigative team.  Giving him the benefit of the doubt I believe he started out with the integrity that his reputation warranted.  Once he started staffing his team with prominent, well know extremely liberal prosecutors and lawyers, his impartiality quickly became questionable.

As of this writing he has removed two members of his team due to their obvious biases and desire to destroy the President Of The United States.

Regardless of what the evidence is, what he reports, what indictments, if any, are issued, everything has been tainted by the unprecedented bias displayed by his team of investigators.

If he truly is a honest impartial prosecutor, he should terminate the investigation where it is now without any publishing any findings.  He should turn over his investigative documents to the Attorney General and dismantle his team.

Mueller removed FBI agent from Trump investigation over possible bias

More Clinton ties on Mueller Team

WashPost’s Marcus Admits “Democratic Tilt” to Mueller investigative Team